stition and Despotism -- these form the high incentives to action --
action -- action, on our part.
It must be enforced upon Texians and upon those who would co-operate with
them in a war with Mexico, that, when the enterprise is undertaken, we must
strike at her vitality -- we must supplant all the vestiges of her changeful but
always licentious and despotic government, with Anglo-Saxon Institutions.
Cocke's ideas were typical of those found among Galvestonians and other
Texans anxious to take direct, forceful action against Mexico; but, as is
evident from subsequent action during 1842, these views did not represent
the general opinion of the people of Texas. Even among those in favor of
strong measures against Mexico, there were very different opinions as to
procedures and objectives. Dr. Edmund J. Felder, who had acted as surgeon
on Ross' Federalist campaign, was asked by the President's private secretary
to comment on the public attitude at Houston toward the Republic's relations
with Mexico and to express himself. His remarks, contained in his letter of
March 1 to Washington D.
Miller,[87] are extremely
interesting in the light
of subsequent events, and may have had some part in molding the thinking of
both Miller and the President after the Vasquez raid.
The voice of this people [he wrote from the City of Houston] is for war, as
you may find from the proceedings of a town meeting held not long since and
published in the papers of the city -- at which they unanimously passed upon
Resolutions requesting President Houston to permit our Navy to remain at
sea, for the purpose of hampering the enemy, and if need be punish them for
injuries done to the prisoners of the Santa Fé expedition; and should they be
injured this people in my opinion, will be for invasion almos[t] unanimously.
This is my desire. I have been in favor of such measures all of two years, but
for different objects than excites most persons who are favouring the project
both here and in the United States.
With me conquest is out of the question, for already we have more territory
than can be disposed of for less than a pep[p]er corn p[e]r acre. We have not
money and means to defend effectually our present limited borders from the
Indian & Robber. I am aware many calculate on much assistance from the
people of the United States; but this is a very fallacy; there cannot be greater
excitement gotten up in that country in favour of an invasion for the conquest
of Mexico than was in favour of Texas during
87. Edmund J. Felder to W. D. Miller, City of Houston, March 1, 1842,
in W. D. Miller Papers, 1833-1860, ms.
|